I thought Romney was a shoe in. He had more money, connections, endorsements and on top of everything he “looked Presidential” which means nothing to anybody except the dopes who vote in the Republican primary and the dopes who report on the primaries. To them it far more important to look Presidential than to be a good potential President (see Bush, George W.)
I think two things happened on his way to the coronation. On the one hand evangelical Christians turned out to be much more stubborn than he anticipated. That is why he is giving his “Mormonism is not a cult” speech. There are just a lot of religious bigots in the GOP (shocker!) and they hate Romney’s flavor of Christianity.
He migh have been able to overcome that, but the other thing that happened is that he failed to match up well against Senator Clinton. Beating Senator Clinton is EVERYTHING to the GOP. They hate Clinton so God Damn much it would make Hitler blush. The very notion that Senator Clinton could become the President fills the GOP with such morbid dread that it borders on pathological. [BTW - all this Clinton hatred is funny to me because she is the most "republican" candidate in the Democratic field.]
Anyway, the GOP took one look at Romney and said, “Clinton would destroy this guy.” And they are right.
All the flipp floppery in Romney’s recent past would make easy work for the Clintons. He would make Clinton look honest by comparison.
Bottom Line: Romney is done.
December 4, 2007 at 5:25 pm
Personally, Jason, I also believe Romney is done, but I think that your throwaway line, “There are just a lot of religious bigots in the GOP (shocker!)” is more important.
I will agree that that there are a lot of exceptionally intolerant people in the GOP, and that many of them are evangelical Christians. What I wonder is whether you will agree that anyone who characterizes anyone solely on the basis of religion (for instance, liberals who think all born-again Christians are bigots just because….) is pretty reprehensible?
How about, there are a lot of bigots in both wings of the Demopublican party?
December 4, 2007 at 5:43 pm
There are a lot of religious bigots around on both sides of the political spectrum these days and I don’t think that we’ve paid much homage to our tolerant, secular heritage by pandering to them.
December 4, 2007 at 6:23 pm
And the Goopers won’t show up for the African-American sponsored debate and they want to send all the brown people back where they came from and there’s the Southern strategy aimed solely at white men, and just a whole lot of muck designed to set us back a century or so. Such a delightful group of people.
December 5, 2007 at 10:18 am
Religious bigotry is not unique to any political party — it is, however, a structural piece of the repub platform (cf. John McCain’s recent pandering when in 2000 he wanted no part of these people). Dems simply have not institutionalized religious bigotry in the same way.
December 5, 2007 at 10:51 am
My god can kick your god’s ass!
Oh Great Xzerno, spite those who mock thee!
Xzerno wears special communicating undies too! And she’s not happy with your mocking of underwear-wearing deities, or her followers for that matter!
December 5, 2007 at 11:08 am
aren’t born agains bigots?
December 5, 2007 at 11:30 am
I strike you all with my noodley appendage!
TFSM
December 5, 2007 at 12:43 pm
Xzerno wears special communicating undies too!
Admit it, Xzerno is Tyra Banks, right?
December 5, 2007 at 12:51 pm
Xzerno is not of this world, for she is Grace Jones and her scent is: Strangé