Perhaps I am not communicating my point clearly dear.

Sokola on Ramone would be the stupid position of bringing up the business problems…declasse but not completely irrelevant for someone going into the Assembly.

Ramone on Sokola is the shit that Ramone put out a la sign-gate. Dana remembers PROOF. I don’t.

remember only a Sith deals in absolutes.

-Obi Wan Kenobi

She says:

“Dana, there is nothing here from me about Sokola on Ramone.”

NOW a sober thinking person would bother to check the thread before they wrote such a claim, but in her stupor she fogot. So let’s examine what she said here. Notice these are HER words. I point that out because when Nancy attacks a person she almost never quotes what they say but mischaracterizes what they said into something she finds easier to attack (e.g., my comments on Larry Craig). Here is he #12:

“Dave Sokola had to fend off this crap from the GOPer scum who ran against him last election.
At that time it was made known that this is a documented GOPer strategy. They teach this skullduggery in GOPer scum school.”

Nothing here from her about Sakola from “the GOPer scum who ran against him last election” (“Ramone”)? LOL! Nay, nothing unless Ramone = Scum doesn’t count. What an idiot Namcy is!

“He also has a fixation on McDowell, admittedly shared by many progressives. My mind is more open but Dana takes my counter punches of his one-sided stance as “I must be getting paid by McDowell” etc., etc. absurd reaching that does nothing to bolster his creds.”

As to this, you don’t have an open mind. You have an inconsistent one. You condemn in some candidates what you accept in McDowell. I heard the man say in a debate w/ Tyler & the other guy that he opposes Peterson’s FOIA bill. You support it, but you give him a pass on it. I have heard you speak favorably before about wind power, but once McDowell didn’t like it neither did you. Your animus toward Potter is all related to your devotion to McDowell. That’s transparent.

But I’ve thought about this Nancy. You can be a zealot for McDowell for any reason but that wouldn’t keep me from associating w/ you. But when you went w/ him against Bluewater you like him condemned DE to energy dependence to big corps; perhaps, even the nation since DE’s windpower project would be the biggest in the nation. I know if McDowell had supported it, so would you. But he didn’t. It’s one thing to support him on some things of lesser consequences. But when you gave up on the Bluewater deal for him and trashed the public and national good potentially for generations, you crossed a line w/ me. I want nothing more to do w/ you. Please don’t comment on my blog or speak to me in public. Someone like Grex can oppose Bluewater because he’s a corporation nazi and get my attention because he’s not hypocritical. But you, Nancy, when you trash a value I know you possess because of your strange devotion to one politician, well, as far as I’m concerned, you have done the political equivalent of selling your soul. As far as this progressive is concerned, you are Judas Iscariot. I want nothing more to do w/ you.

The god comment was all about your influence over Burris.

Your curious lack of humor and inability to appreciate irony must be why you typically fail to grasp what people are actually saying to you most of the time. Get a life!

~*~
miscreant
Dana “never” loses an argument. I handed him his ass on the discussion about Larry Craig too but his ego prevents him from accepting it.
He also has a fixation on McDowell, admittedly shared by many progressives. My mind is more open but Dana takes my counter punches of his one-sided stance as “I must be getting paid by McDowell” etc., etc. absurd reaching that does nothing to bolster his creds.

It has nothing to do w/ Biden.

“That being said, you’re doing a wonderful job of handing Garrett his in this debate.”

Yea, if using distortion and obfuscation and a total lack of evidence is “handling” me well, she is great.
*********************

I’m making a copy of this link in order to show how the establishment Dems lied about the Ramone & Sakola race, continue to do so, and use this lie to revise the record of what actually happened in the race to cover their tracks when they pull the same dirty in other races.

Anon was smart in keeping anonymous, but Nancy Willing has just established a record on the web of aiding and abetting the lie. She has lost what little credibility she had.

http://www.downwithabsolutes.com/

The film makes it clear the Dems lied about Sakola being arrested on the hit piece they sent out throughout the district right before the election.

“They say you have to do it,” Sakola said.

Anon is a liar and Nancy Willing is a fellow traveler.
Case closed.

See how that Biden thing keeps biting you in the ass? That being said, you’re doing a wonderful job of handing Garrett his in this debate.

Love,
miscreant

oh wow, so now I am an alchy? Yeah, I got drunk at Matthews party. I was nervous about meeting Wharton in person since I had supported Biden and all y’all were big Wharton affictionatos.
When I am nervous, I sometimes hit the booze.

No doubt you have turned that incident into one of your favorite stories. Big man that.

No, Nancy, I’m not even close to being godlike. But I’m not surprised you believe that anyone who isn’t a shill for the DE Dem Party is a god. Your mistake is in failing to grasp it requires very little effort for others to be better than you.

*
sheesh, nothing better describes your ego problem than that comment. Good on ya idiot.