Comments on: Q: Will Mike Castle’s position on the impeachment of George Bush be an election issue in 2008? http://delawareliberal.wordpress.com/2007/07/22/q-will-mike-castles-position-on-the-impeachment-of-george-bush-be-an-election-issue-in-2008/ America IS NUMBER ONE!!! (but not for the reasons wingnuts think it is) Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:10:45 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: kavips http://delawareliberal.wordpress.com/2007/07/22/q-will-mike-castles-position-on-the-impeachment-of-george-bush-be-an-election-issue-in-2008/#comment-13734 kavips Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:14:42 +0000 http://delawareliberal.wordpress.com/2007/07/22/q-will-mike-castles-position-on-the-impeachment-of-george-bush-be-an-election-issue-in-2008/#comment-13734 Whenever one examines facts, it becomes obvious that you have very good reasons for being so....(delusional) And speaking of naming post offices, not only did the Republicans change the names more often than did the Democrats, but they arrogantly chose to name the post offices after their political supporters. The Democrats, of course, felt obligated to rename them after real heros, such as those killed in Iraq, or an ex-president who died just as this congress was coming into session. Whenever one examines facts, it becomes obvious that you have very good reasons for being so….(delusional)

And speaking of naming post offices, not only did the Republicans change the names more often than did the Democrats, but they arrogantly chose to name the post offices after their political supporters. The Democrats, of course, felt obligated to rename them after real heros, such as those killed in Iraq, or an ex-president who died just as this congress was coming into session.

]]> By: kavips http://delawareliberal.wordpress.com/2007/07/22/q-will-mike-castles-position-on-the-impeachment-of-george-bush-be-an-election-issue-in-2008/#comment-13732 kavips Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:05:15 +0000 http://delawareliberal.wordpress.com/2007/07/22/q-will-mike-castles-position-on-the-impeachment-of-george-bush-be-an-election-issue-in-2008/#comment-13732 Mr. Chairman: if I got issues, then I am afraid you've got more. If you call <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/d?d109,d109:0:./temp/~bdkzOX:[[o]]&items=100&|/bss/d109query.html|" rel="nofollow">this</a> effective, you have 88 more issues in the 109th republican congress.....than Pelosi's 110th ever did..... (For those with slow servers: Democrats: 50 post offices/ Republicans:138) Mr. Chairman: if I got issues, then I am afraid you’ve got more.

If you call this effective, you have 88 more issues in the 109th republican congress…..than Pelosi’s 110th ever did…..

(For those with slow servers:
Democrats: 50 post offices/ Republicans:138)

]]> By: Chris http://delawareliberal.wordpress.com/2007/07/22/q-will-mike-castles-position-on-the-impeachment-of-george-bush-be-an-election-issue-in-2008/#comment-13681 Chris Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:34:11 +0000 http://delawareliberal.wordpress.com/2007/07/22/q-will-mike-castles-position-on-the-impeachment-of-george-bush-be-an-election-issue-in-2008/#comment-13681 Yes Dave...but remember...that we (conservatives) are the dilusional ones. Yes Dave…but remember…that we (conservatives) are the dilusional ones.

]]> By: Dave http://delawareliberal.wordpress.com/2007/07/22/q-will-mike-castles-position-on-the-impeachment-of-george-bush-be-an-election-issue-in-2008/#comment-13657 Dave Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:51:56 +0000 http://delawareliberal.wordpress.com/2007/07/22/q-will-mike-castles-position-on-the-impeachment-of-george-bush-be-an-election-issue-in-2008/#comment-13657 If you call <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/gourl?URL=%2Fcgi-bin%2Fbdquery%2FL%3Fd110%3A.%2Flist%2Fbd%2Fd110pl.lst%3A1%5B1-48%5D%28Public_Laws%29%7CTOM%3A%2Fbss%2Fd110query.html%7C&submit=VIEW" rel="nofollow">this</a> effective, you have issues. If you call this effective, you have issues.

]]> By: Dave http://delawareliberal.wordpress.com/2007/07/22/q-will-mike-castles-position-on-the-impeachment-of-george-bush-be-an-election-issue-in-2008/#comment-13656 Dave Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:45:50 +0000 http://delawareliberal.wordpress.com/2007/07/22/q-will-mike-castles-position-on-the-impeachment-of-george-bush-be-an-election-issue-in-2008/#comment-13656 Kavips -- There is so much comedy in that statement, I don't know where to start. How many bills (besides renaming post offices) have gone to the President for his signature or veto during this Congress? Kavips — There is so much comedy in that statement, I don’t know where to start.

How many bills (besides renaming post offices) have gone to the President for his signature or veto during this Congress?

]]> By: kavips http://delawareliberal.wordpress.com/2007/07/22/q-will-mike-castles-position-on-the-impeachment-of-george-bush-be-an-election-issue-in-2008/#comment-13653 kavips Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:00:59 +0000 http://delawareliberal.wordpress.com/2007/07/22/q-will-mike-castles-position-on-the-impeachment-of-george-bush-be-an-election-issue-in-2008/#comment-13653 J provides the republican slant of the congress, Of course they try to downplay its effectiveness. <a href="http://democrats.senate.gov/newsroom/record.cfm?id=272311" rel="nofollow">Here is the Democrats take</a>. Of course they try to up-play its effectiveness. So even as "J" tries to belittle Pelosi, he proves once again, that despite whatever charges they throw at her, her effectiveness has outperformed Hastert's House by a longshot. J provides the republican slant of the congress, Of course they try to downplay its effectiveness.

Here is the Democrats take. Of course they try to up-play its effectiveness.

So even as “J” tries to belittle Pelosi, he proves once again, that despite whatever charges they throw at her, her effectiveness has outperformed Hastert’s House by a longshot.

]]> By: jason330 http://delawareliberal.wordpress.com/2007/07/22/q-will-mike-castles-position-on-the-impeachment-of-george-bush-be-an-election-issue-in-2008/#comment-13643 jason330 Mon, 23 Jul 2007 03:31:46 +0000 http://delawareliberal.wordpress.com/2007/07/22/q-will-mike-castles-position-on-the-impeachment-of-george-bush-be-an-election-issue-in-2008/#comment-13643 I think his/her comment is some kind of unfunny satire. She/He isn't serious. I think his/her comment is some kind of unfunny satire. She/He isn’t serious.

]]> By: Nancy Willing http://delawareliberal.wordpress.com/2007/07/22/q-will-mike-castles-position-on-the-impeachment-of-george-bush-be-an-election-issue-in-2008/#comment-13641 Nancy Willing Mon, 23 Jul 2007 03:12:41 +0000 http://delawareliberal.wordpress.com/2007/07/22/q-will-mike-castles-position-on-the-impeachment-of-george-bush-be-an-election-issue-in-2008/#comment-13641 so an economy bouyed by death and misery at the expence of our international reputation and the creation of domestic insecurity is ok by so called conservatives? the viet nam war also bouyed the economy, all wars have. shame on you J. our soldiers are not fighting for stockholders to reap dividends. so an economy bouyed by death and misery at the expence of our international reputation and the creation of domestic insecurity is ok by so called conservatives?
the viet nam war also bouyed the economy, all wars have. shame on you J.
our soldiers are not fighting for stockholders to reap dividends.

]]> By: jason330 http://delawareliberal.wordpress.com/2007/07/22/q-will-mike-castles-position-on-the-impeachment-of-george-bush-be-an-election-issue-in-2008/#comment-13630 jason330 Mon, 23 Jul 2007 00:12:41 +0000 http://delawareliberal.wordpress.com/2007/07/22/q-will-mike-castles-position-on-the-impeachment-of-george-bush-be-an-election-issue-in-2008/#comment-13630 The fact that nobody can make a case for why Bush should not be impeached without maligning Democrats speaks volumes. Sticking to the topic at hand does not appear to be a Republican virtue. The fact that nobody can make a case for why Bush should not be impeached without maligning Democrats speaks volumes.

Sticking to the topic at hand does not appear to be a Republican virtue.

]]> By: Von Cracker http://delawareliberal.wordpress.com/2007/07/22/q-will-mike-castles-position-on-the-impeachment-of-george-bush-be-an-election-issue-in-2008/#comment-13626 Von Cracker Sun, 22 Jul 2007 22:12:44 +0000 http://delawareliberal.wordpress.com/2007/07/22/q-will-mike-castles-position-on-the-impeachment-of-george-bush-be-an-election-issue-in-2008/#comment-13626 What does Pelosi actually represent that makes her a loser and everything wrong with this country? Is it because she’s a Dem? A woman? From San Fran? What exactly? All I ever hear out of the right are fantastical statements with no FACTS to back them up, only just opinion. I wasn't for impeachment because it's an extraordinary measure, and should be used in the direst circumstances, such as blow jobs. But now I am all for it. Not because it's a republican (if you can call the cabal in the WH that), but for the reason that the Executive is making outlandish power-grabs, breaking the law, and refuses to be accountable, by not submitting to what is the inherent right of Congress. The over-reaching executive privilege whine has got to stop, and Bush is only backing himself into a corner, looking for a fight. And if you're gonna bitch about the Dem Congress, then you really should take into consideration the Filibuster-loving GOP. They are the obstructionist, as it pertains to the lack of legislation coming through. Maybe the Dems should consider the "Nuclear Option" now....the GOP had no problem invoking that, just for judicial nominees. So, using a rethug technique to save American soldiers lives would be on good moral standing, and no one on the right could have a legitimate gripe. What does Pelosi actually represent that makes her a loser and everything wrong with this country? Is it because she’s a Dem? A woman? From San Fran? What exactly?

All I ever hear out of the right are fantastical statements with no FACTS to back them up, only just opinion.

I wasn’t for impeachment because it’s an extraordinary measure, and should be used in the direst circumstances, such as blow jobs.

But now I am all for it. Not because it’s a republican (if you can call the cabal in the WH that), but for the reason that the Executive is making outlandish power-grabs, breaking the law, and refuses to be accountable, by not submitting to what is the inherent right of Congress. The over-reaching executive privilege whine has got to stop, and Bush is only backing himself into a corner, looking for a fight.

And if you’re gonna bitch about the Dem Congress, then you really should take into consideration the Filibuster-loving GOP. They are the obstructionist, as it pertains to the lack of legislation coming through.

Maybe the Dems should consider the “Nuclear Option” now….the GOP had no problem invoking that, just for judicial nominees. So, using a rethug technique to save American soldiers lives would be on good moral standing, and no one on the right could have a legitimate gripe.

]]>